Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update latest changes from Submodule #359

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 13, 2024
Merged

Update latest changes from Submodule #359

merged 7 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

Hrishabh17
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The update in fyle_integrations_imports involves a shift in the subproject's commit hash, indicating a significant change in the subproject. This alteration could encompass bug fixes, feature upgrades, or performance optimizations, essential for software efficiency and reliability.

Changes

Files or Directories Changed Summary of Changes
fyle_integrations_imports Subproject commit hash updated from aebcd118f0717c351ad5e07c197f6f5b33289869 to c370d01904eea8d30877e9d47cc94ae29ca387f5
test_base.py Modifications to construct_attributes_filter method in the base class with additional key-value pairs in assertions.
.github/workflows/codecov.yml Changed coverage threshold from 88 to 87 in the docker-compose command for running tests.

🐇✨
A hop, a skip, in the code abyss,
A new hash blooms, old bugs dismissed.
Through fields of data, swift we race,
With every commit, a better place.
Cheers to changes, big and small,
In code we trust, hop to it all! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7829ace and 7624834.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • fyle_integrations_imports (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • fyle_integrations_imports

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
159 0 💤 1 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 5s ⏱️

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
159 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 5s ⏱️

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 requested a review from ashwin1111 May 9, 2024 11:10
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2)

Line range hint 259-259: Refactor the comparison to False to use a more Pythonic expression.

- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == False
+ if not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved

Line range hint 274-274: Refactor the comparison to True to use a more Pythonic expression.

- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == True
+ if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved
Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7624834 and 11e7604.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Ruff (4)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (4)

155-155: Comparison to None should be cond is None


170-170: Comparison to None should be cond is None


259-259: Avoid equality comparisons to False; use if not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved: for false checks


274-274: Avoid equality comparisons to True; use if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved: for truth checks

Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (1)

Line range hint 66-79: The updated assertions in test_construct_attributes_filter correctly reflect the new expected dictionary structure. Ensure that the rest of the application logic aligns with these changes.

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
159 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 5s ⏱️

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 added the deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging label May 13, 2024
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
159 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 5s ⏱️

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 added deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging and removed deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging labels May 13, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2)

Line range hint 259-259: Use idiomatic Python for false checks.

- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == False
+ if not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved

Line range hint 274-274: Use idiomatic Python for truth checks.

- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == True
+ if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved
Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11e7604 and 7251d14.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fyle_integrations_imports (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • fyle_integrations_imports
Additional Context Used
Ruff (4)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (4)

155-155: Comparison to None should be cond is None


170-170: Comparison to None should be cond is None


259-259: Avoid equality comparisons to False; use if not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved: for false checks


274-274: Avoid equality comparisons to True; use if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved: for truth checks

Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (3)

66-66: LGTM! The addition of 'active': True aligns with the new requirements for attribute filtering.


75-75: LGTM! The updated assertion correctly reflects the new filtering logic for 'COST_CENTER'.


79-79: LGTM! The updated assertion correctly reflects the new filtering logic for 'CUSTOMER'.

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 removed the deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging label May 13, 2024
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
159 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 4s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7251d14 and b3d5c23.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/codecov.yml

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 merged commit 63d103a into master May 13, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants